-
Renunciation
: The
Last Postscript
You are like a coral
reef in the Indian
Ocean with strange and beautiful fish
darting
about, and other
curious creatures.
The divorced Hilda to
Stanley, 1939.
It was not
unusual in
those days of maiden aunts residual
from large Victorian families for Patrica and
Dorothy to set up home together as a pair of
single women, and even less so after the Great
War when almost a generation of marriageable young men was wiped out.
But in
those
less libertarian years, the thought of the
two women enjoying mutual
sex, although not illegal
as for men, was not so socially tolerated. There
is evidence that
as early as 1928 - the year The Well
of Loneliness was published and then banned as obscene -
residents in Cookham
suspected the couple of lesbianism,
with several displaying
their disapproval in practical terms even though
they were given no proof. Indeed Patricia consistently denied it to the
end of her days, vehemently and even aggressively if it were suggested.
Stanley's infatuation with
Patricia mystified his contemporaries and has long puzzled his
commentators. It is incomprehensible if
seen only from
the down-to-earth level or that of everyday
practicality, the view which the artworld of his time and Patricia
herself took of it. Innocence on Stanley's part
is sometimes invoked, but his
outlook in other circumstances scarcely justifies this interpretation,
and in any case it was not long before he and Hilda had become
discreetly
aware.
More feasible is pride. As a prodigal son of Cookham, Stanley had
returned
as a celebrity in 1932 basking in the success of The Cookham Resurrection and
Burghclere
masterpieces. Back in his native village the future seemed to open
gloriously
before him, with new excitements promising unprecedented ventures, and
there
too Patricia dangled for him the new Cookham-feelings
through which he
felt
he might achieve them.
Viewed in this 'up-in-heaven' light,
Stanley's
longing for physical and emotional access to
Patricia is more
understandable. Their sexual relationship was
finally cemented, according to Patricia's account, when she
accompanied him on a second
commission to Switzerland in 1935. But equally he
wanted to maintain the same access to Hilda who was still his
major Muse. Convincing himself that the
legality of the marriage-state was irrelevant to artists such as
themselves, he set out to secure
both women as 'wives'. Merely
thinking
up so fraught a plan can seem bizarre to conventional folk, and Stanley
was aware of its effect and of the compulsion which drove him to it : My personal life [his ego or 'universal'
identity] is up-in-heaven life.
My impersonal life [his id or
individual everyday identity] is
a separate-from-me thing, and my behaviour [as seen by others] is quite
difficult.
A major stumbling-block to Stanley's tripartite
'marriage' was
the fact that the pragmatic Patricia would only consent if she were
the
legal wife. So he quietly devised a scheme,
the gist of which would reverse Hilda's rôle
by
persuading her to divorce him, and then, after his marriage to
Patricia, to
return
to him as his other 'wife'. But then there were obstacles
too in that
scenario. Hilda's high
principles and her view of marriage as a sacrament made Stanley
all-too-aware he could
not be certain she would be willing to return as the other
'wife'. So he in setting up his
byzantine scheme, he planned to keep Hilda initially unaware and to
take care not to alarm
Patricia by any qualms as to its possible failure (he could keep
his mouth shut when he
wanted, an exasperated Patricia
later discovered to her dismay.) He thus gave himself two
potential rods to his back.
To
persuade Hilda, now almost permanently in Hampstead, to divorce
him, Stanley
set out in
an almost frenzied exchange of letters to
convince her of
his overriding need for Patricia.
With a brutal candour which a
reader can find offensive but the frankness of which Hilda clearly
understood as the scars of his frustration, he told her Patricia is the reward for the all best work I have
done (he was glowing
with self-satisfaction at
accomplishing his
forthright nudes of Patricia and at finding himself able at last to use his sex
feelings without guilt as elements in a new series of imaginative
paintings he called his sex-pictures.)
The divorce proceedings
which the
bemused Hilda
reluctantly initiated were,
in the manner of those days, prolonged. In
making his
moves Stanley had
patently to undertake much
dissembling, and as such dissembling was against his instinctive
honesty, there were times when he became ferociously touchy. The
ambivalence of his feelings at this period emerges in two of his most
memorable paintings, his Lovers or The Dustman of 1934
and his St
Francis and the Birds of 1935, both of which were the source
of his notorious resignation from the
Royal Academy in 1935.
The
decree
nisi was at last
finalised in June
1937. He and Patricia immediately married
at
Maidenhead Registry Office.
A dubious Dorothy Hepworth and a loyal Jas Wood were co-opted as
witnesses. Assertions that the marriage was never consummated may be
doubtful, although the couple's post-wedding celebration,
as described by Stanley to William MacQuitty, was indeed a disaster. It
seems
to be pictured in Stanley's painting The Long Looking Glass,
in which he and Patricia, after a
'wedding breakfast'
lunch in Maidenhead, went back alone to Lindworth. There
Patricia began proceedings by taking such a
lengthy bath that
Stanley could barely sustain his erection. When she emerged highly
made-up
and smoking a cigarette in her usual long elegant holder, habits which
he detested, it collapsed
completely. The painting (possibly
later tampered with) can be
seen as a counterpoint partner to Toasting
which records the
serenity of the afterglow of his lovemaking to Hilda.
One intention of the wife-swop
was to
assure
Patricia
of an income by acting in his name as his business manager, as she was
doing for Dorothy. The sex aspect of the compact
was
that she would continue to provide Stanley with the fantasy sex he
was finding so 'inspirational' in his art
at the time, but that he would rely on Hilda for everything
more. He was aware from
the earlier occasions on which Patricia had consented to sex (seemingly
as
'rewards' for his generous gifts to her) that she found
penetration
painful - it was no good, except
at first, as he later told Hilda. He knew too that Patricia
would
not permit their marriage to jeopardise
her relationship with
the concerned Dorothy and would insist on continuing
to live at Moor Thatch, a
stipulation
which
depended for its social acceptance on her being able to indicate to
the world at large that Hilda had returned to Lindworth and was again a 'wife'
to him. In the meantime, she spent her wedding
night with Dorothy at Moor
Thatch.
The next
morning the two women left early by
rail for
the 'honeymoon' at St.Ives, replete with one trunk, two
suitcases, one black bag, one hand bag, one
hamper, one hat box, one easel bundle, one canvas
bundle, one paintbox and the rest of the wedding cake.
They had taken a
cottage for a month, their first opportunity for a joint holiday in
more than seven penurious years. In accord with
the scheme, Patricia
had previously written to an astonished Hilda inviting
her
to join Stanley on the
'honeymoon', and arranged
separate accommodation for
them.
Back in
Cookham, Stanley, delaying his departure
ostensibly to
finish a
landscape, left a phone message for
Hilda to suggest that as he
was alone at Lindworth for
a few days she might like to come and collect any personal
items she wanted.
Hilda arrived while
Stanley was out painting. Searching the
house,
she
came across her letters to him, all neatly sequenced and tied with
ribbon. She was so moved she did
not have the heart to take them. Instead she tidied the place up
and waited for him to come home. They spent the night together. I can tell you that the joy and
relief of finding that he not only liked me but seemed to be just like
his old self to me was
overwhelming. He assured me that Patricia wanted me to spend the night with him and it
would in no way be harming her.
Stanley must have thought his dream
was materialising, but alas
the next day Stanley began explaining the scheme to me and then I
began to realise that I might have been beguiled by the whole
atmosphere....all the same I did not regret it, as that perfect day
seemed to wipe away all the last few years and to have put things right
between Stanley and me. But she did
not accept his urging to go with him to St Ives, and returned to
Hampstead to think things over.
When Stanley got to St Ives a few
days later, he
went for a walk with Patricia to collect sea-shells for a mirror frame
she
wanted to decorate and he told her of events in Lindworth. According to her
account, promoted
publicly and published later, she
was so shocked at his 'adultery' with Hilda that
an
angry quarrel broke out and
she refused him all conjugal rights. But
if
indeed
an argument did take place, it was patently not the
result of Stanley's
'adultery', which she had been dutifully encouraging as her share in
the scheme. A more likely inference is that any such rumpus was due
to Stanley's practical suggestion
that, with no Hilda there, he could dispense with the
alternative
accommodation and share the two women's cottage, a proposal which
Patricia - already unsettled at his failure to persuade
Hilda
to join
them and alarmed at
the difficulties she would face if Hilda did
not acquiesce
in the scheme - viewed with distaste and vetoed. The
upshot was that
a solitary Stanley found
himself banished for the duration to his separate lodging,
emerging daily in mostly wet
Cornish weather to find a sheltered spot from which to paint local town
and
seascapes to pay for
it all. Whenever he tried to get Patricia to himself, Dorothy was
always there, insisting on making a threesome.
Back in Hampstead, Hilda, talking matters over
with
her
mother, was dissuaded from
further compliance. When the
ever-hopeful Stanley returned and resumed pressure
on her,
spurred
on by his commitment and by the
now impatient Patricia, Mrs Carline took
practical steps to obstruct it.
Every attempt in the following
months to get Hilda to
change her mind ended in failure.
Although
distressed for him at his forlorn hopes, she
remained
adamant, declaring that she could
not be a mistress where I had been
a wife.
Patricia in the meantime,
now his legal wife, stuck unshakably to her
side of their understanding, holding over Stanley the fact that any
sexual
or
inspirational problems into which Hilda's refusal plunged him was not
only his
responsibility, but put
her into as much difficulty as himself. With
no Hilda at Lindworth, she
found herself facing the social necessity of defusing
suspicions as to the real reason she
was
not cohabiting with him. So she judiciously
promulgated in the right ears her
'adultery' version of their St Ives 'quarrel',
with added embellishment of the 'brutality' of his
lovemaking (his nudes of himself, presumably as exact as always,
suggest he was comfortingly endowed.) Roger
Fry's former companion Helen Anrep, a kind-hearted
shepherdess of lost sheep, was only one of several sympathisers so
incensed
at Patricia's version that she thereafter branded Stanley as that
fiend Spencer.
By the early summer of the following year, 1938,
Stanley was forced to accept
that his scheme
had gone badly awry in almost every aspect. He was left saddled
with maintaining a costly Patricia and Dorothy at Moor Thatch,
an absent Hilda and the girls in Hampstead, and himself alone in Lindworth, which as part of
the 'scheme' he had made over
to
Patricia to reduce his tax liabilities. For the
first time in his life he was in financial trouble. His capital
was being depleted
by
traders' demands to settle for the
gifts he had lavished on Patricia, art sales were limited by the
uncertainty
of the approaching war, and in spite of
desperate months of painting landscapes for cash
when he wanted to work on visionary projects, his
income slumped. Patricia's
manipulative efforts
at handling his work were of little help, and in fact threatened his
professional relationship
with his dealer Dudley
Tooth, principal of the international firm of Tooth and Sons (who also
dealt for Augustus John and Jacob Epstein.) Failure to
meet maintenance settlements
brought court proceedings and a threat of imprisonment, an
alarming experience for a celebrity who throughout his life till then
had
managed his money prudently. The last
straw came when Patricia, in need of unpaid maintenance, moved him out
of Lindworth to local
lodgings,
installed electricity and rented out the house for income, although he
retained use of the garden
studio (the house
was used in the
coming war by a shipping company as safe
out-of-London accommodation for merchant navy crews resting between
voyages. Patricia was finally to sell it in 1948.)
Disillusioned, homeless, and with
bankruptcy
looming,
an
uncharacteristically dispirited Stanley locked up
his studio
in
the late summer of
that year and fled to
a rented room in London. There
he went
into hiding and planned his paintings of Christ in
the Wilderness. For weeks, no one knew where he was. He was
eventually located
and helped out of trouble by influential friends and patrons, notably
by John Rothenstein, then Director of the Tate Gallery, and by Dudley
Tooth whose
business acumen (unlike that of Patricia whom he forced out
of her function as Stanley's manager) saved him financially,
although
he was never to be wealthy.
However, a relieved Stanley did
not
immediately settle back in Cookham. At a London
party in the
autumn he met Daphne Charlton ....nearly
intellectual....very opinionated ....marvellous cook....rather
delightful when she was off the sex, according to Ian
Kellam. She lived in Hampstead with her Slade-lecturer
husband George, and by
the June of 1939 the threesome had became a ménage-à-trois
at the Charlton home in New End Square.
With the voracious Daphne,
Stanley
seems to have enjoyed untrammelled sex for the
first
time, indicated by the animal vigour of his
painting
On the Tiger Rug (Hilda on
principle had refused contraception so that he had to practise
withdrawal, while the reluctant Patricia removed all of herself up into her head
which she buried in a pillow, and sub-let the rest of her shifting
body...at high rental, as Stanley told Jas Wood.)
With the
onset of war in 1939 the London Slade relocated to Oxford, and the trio
of Stanley,
Daphne and George moved to a village pub at Leonard
Stanley
in Gloucestershire From there Stanley commuted
periodically to a blitzed London and to Port Glasgow where he was
engaged first on his shipbuilding paintings for the then War Artists
Advisory Committee, followed by his Port Glasgow Resurrections.
There, in Glasgow, he met another admirer, the
cultured refugee psychiatrist Dr Charlotte Murray, and they too became
lovers.
Still homeless at the end of the war,
Stanley was offered by his brother Percy the purchase of a small
Spencer-family cottage,
Cliveden View, in Cookham Rise,
where
their sister Annie had been temporarily domiciled after leaving Fernlea. He gladly accepted it, with Dudley
Tooth arranging to finance the mortgage for him. A filmed
visit to him at the cottage is
available at <www.britishpathe.com>
by
entering <Stanley
Spencer> in Search. He occupied
it until the closing months of his life, when friends moved
him
back into the empty Fernlea which
had just
come up for sale, by then renamed Fernley. (Since then Cliveden View
has been
enlarged to double its original size and Fernley renovated - see
<www.flickr.com> search <Stanley Spencer>.)
Back in
Cookham and taking up in his cottage the
threads of his
professional career,
Stanley resumed cordial if asexual contact with Patricia who was now so thin it is terrible to see (anaemia was diagnosed) and helping the women move furniture when an
exceptionally
high Thames flood threatened to maroon them in Moor Thatch. But he
was also receiving comforting visits from Daphne Charlton who was back
again in Hampstead, and he was
corresponding and visiting with Charlotte
Murray in Glasgow. Charlotte was daughter of a German-Jewish professor
of mathematics in pre-Nazi days. A fine musician, she had studied
medicine at Heidelberg and psychology with Jung in Switzerland. She had met her
husband Graham when he taught art at her war refugee reception centre,
but had become frustrated at finding little use for her talents in
wartime Scotland, where he was now art master at Port Glasgow High
School. Spellbound
by Stanley's
metaphysical approach to art, she took a post
in London to be near him, abandoning
the
long-suffering Graham
in Glasgow. Fists apparently flew when she
and
Daphne Charlton met by mischance one day in
Cookham.
Hilda in the meantime had
remained with her
ageing mother Annie until their invaluable housekeeper Mrs Arnfield
retired in 1937.
They then joined her brother Richard (who had met artist Nancy Higgins
in 1934) at
his home, also in Hampstead but in nearby
Pond Street. Her daughters Shirin and
Unity were awarded bursaries at Badminton School in Bristol, evacuated
during
the war to Lynmouth in Devon. Hilda remained with the supportive
Richard
and
Nancy in the difficult war and postwar years through her mother's
death,
her own mental breakdown and two bouts of breast cancer. A monograph on
her
life and art by Alison Thomas was published in 1999 to support an
exhibition of her work curated by Timothy Wilcox. Most of her
collection has now been dispersed.
Richard's WWI experience as
an air observer was used in WWII in developing camouflage, and he and
Nancy became closely involved in refugee artists' affairs. Stanley kept
in continual contact, made regular visits to Hilda during her
spells in hospital, and when
she recovered, periodically had her to stay with him in
a brotherly-sister fashion, or to join him on
excursions. Richard
was
later to become an arts counsellor for UNESCO, travelling widely. Among
his activities
was the publishing of his book on
his early years with Stanley and the first comprehensive exhibition of
Stanley's
work at the Royal Academy in 1980. He died the following year. Nancy
died
Jan 2005 aged 94.
Hilda's final collapse from her
second bout of breast cancer, ending in her death in 1950, brought
down a curtain in Stanley's creative life. Publicly, he
remained as extrovert as ever, enjoying visits to and from friends and
family,
attending functions, taking part in lectures, films and broadcasts, and
undertaking commissioned portraits.
But
inwardly he retreated into a
kind
of monastic existence in his Cookham cottage, doing his best to break
contact with his three women. His numbed
reaction can be seen in his painting Dinner
on
the Ferry Hotel Lawn (Tate Gallery T00141), one of the
'predellas'
of his Christ Preaching at Cookham
Regatta series. He began by launching surprise
divorce proceedings against Patricia, claiming
her vaunted assertions of
non-consummation : shocked, she reacted so
robustly that he was advised to settle for a legal separation
with
periodically updated
maintenance. Then his attempts, ludicrous at
times,
to evade visits from a resolute Daphne became
a source of village merriment. But a dejected Charlotte gave in and
resignedly
returned to the patient Graham in Glasgow, her hopes of
conceiving a child by Stanley dashed when none came. A Trust was
set up to safeguard the interests of Stanley's two daughters. Echoing
the family genes, Shirin became a musician, Unity an artist.
Although Patricia and Stanley
never acknowledged each other after the separation, she insisted on
being addressed as Lady Spencer when he was knighted in
the summer of 1959, and after his death from cancer the following
December
even claimed the pension available to widows of RAs (Stanley had been
reinstated by Sir Gerald Kelly in 1950 as the Pathé newsreel
indicates.)
Dorothy and she remained at Moor
Thatch, with Dorothy
continuing
painting and exhibiting (mostly portraits and local views : she was a
gifted miniaturist when younger) and Patricia enjoying
with her a profitable hobby in the buying and selling of portable
antiques
at sales and auctions. One of their finds, a mediaeval carving of St
Catherine, is now in the Victoria and Albert Museum.
Financially comfortable again
at last, although in chronic bad health, Patricia died aged 72 in 1966,
so permitting the posthumous publication of her version
of her life with Stanley earlier ghosted by Louise Collis (Stanley Spencer: A Private View, Heinemann
1972.) The details
she provided Louise were accurately compiled
but she distorted their implications provocatively to safeguard her
relationship with Dorothy, about which both remained highly reticent
and reclusive. She gave little sympathy to the metaphysical aspects of
Stanley's outlook. Dorothy survived her, slowly losing her sight, and
often cared for by Patricia's even older sister Sybil from London, a
dignified and kindly soul who, as manager of a Mayfair Nanny agency, had done
what she could to keep the
couple afloat during their poverty years - the best daughter a man ever had
according to their father -
and in many ways the reverse in character of Patricia, on whom he
made
no comment.
I sit here
with a fire and every comfort, Dorothy wrote in
her diary after Patricia's death.
To be together and no worry, sufficient money, reasonable health. We
did not have it, and what we did have we fought for bitterly. My whole
self aches for her. But I do not want her back if I could, not
to face old age. She died aged 80 in 1978.
A monograph dealing with their
(actually Dorothy's) considerable output of painting, and the unusual
way in which it was presented in Patricia's name, is currently (2005)
under preparation. A brief account of their relationship is given in
the attached
website, based on the several exhibitions of Dorothy's work set up
in London and USA by Michael Dickens.
Dorothy
and Patricia lie together in Cookham Cemetery (with the increase of
population
in the parish,
the churchyard had long been closed to burials.) Hilda too
had
earlier been laid to rest in the cemetery,
and Stanley had
arranged to be
interred there with
her in a family plot. But
his influential executors decided, despite family preferences, that at
the close of a lifetime
laurel-leafed with national and international honours, he should
lie in the ancient churchyard of the village which
had meant so much to him. So he was cremated and his
ashes
laid, with due ceremony, beside the path through to Bellrope
Meadow. A discreet
marble memorial
marks the spot.
Home